by Navinn Rajendran
By end of this article, some readers are
going to curse me while chest palming and throwing handful of sand on me. I
will be expected to turn blind because God is going to poke my eyes and my life
is going to turn out disastrous because I angered God and its institution. These
reactions only reflect to how well you have been pious and religious.
Temples has been an integrated institution
in the Malaysian Indian community. People whom used to be in the estates would
recall on the simple needs the community was provided with. Temple was one of
them. But over time many changes have taken place, many issues have arisen, and
many questions have been left unanswered because the Malaysian Indians simply
just don’t care.
Are
you going to disagree with what I have just said? I can hear some calling me
atheist already.
What
is a temple and why it is built?
There are many reasons to why temples are
built and as far as Sanathana Dharma is concerned, the reasons can vary in
accordance to the needs of time. In my observance, there are 3 reasons.
Firstly, a temple is an energy centre. A temple is built in a certain
direction, certain position, certain shape and structure to be able generate
and store positive energy and to be able to cleanse and connect the devotees
that steps into the temple. Secondly, when the values in the community
declined, temples were built so that individuals could spend some time in a
designated area reflecting on their actions and repenting over their mistakes.
It’s more like what we call REHAB these days. The third reason for modern times
is obviously for money and fame. Fellas disagree? I’ll get in detail in a bit.
How
many types of religious institutional structures do Malaysian Hindus have?
As far structures are concerned there are
only two and definitely many Malaysians have been misguided by many people over
this part of the issue. We have temples and shrines. What’s the difference?
Temples are a bigger in structure, more organized in systems and
administration, and they have a proper priest either from India or Malaysians
whom have gone to India to study the Vedic Education and later serve the
Malaysian Temples. Shrines on the other hand are small structures which mostly
has the Hindu guardian god and does not necessarily have to have Vedic
education in depth. To get into a little detail on priest, we have the
Gurukkals whom serves a fully consecrated temple and the Pusaris whom could be
anyone and only their devotion matters for them to serve. This is the briefest
I could get on giving a general idea to the readers.
What
is my problem actually?
I don’t have any problem with temples being
constructed, maintained and serve its ultimate purpose. Temples are beautiful
and they are important. But my concern is where are we placing our importance?
How well are these temples functioning for the progression of the community?
Out rightly the institution is not at its best looking at the current situation
of the Malaysian Indian community.
Firstly, there are just too many temples in
the country that are less functional with almost zero sustainability. They
solely rely on government funds which can be sourced out to other channels that
the community needs such as Economy and Education. In a very small area there
would be a minimum of one temple and many other shrines scattered within the
vicinity. Why can’t all the shrines be in one compound as the temple is in? And
we will be the first to protest when shrines are demolished and turn it into a
political issue.
Secondly, how many temples are run by
Hindus themselves? How many temple management have an institutional
sustainability plan where the expenses of the temple and maintenance are being
run on a monthly generated income through a business or service? The only thing
that Hindus know is how to make a temple bigger every 12 years. Why can’t they
build a multipurpose hall either inside the compound or even outside the temple
and to rent them out for functions and sports? We know that many temples do
have multipurpose halls but apart from marriages and community functions there
isn’t much activity that could be done. Why can’t temples make investment in
services that brings in return that can be used for community’s progress.
Without shame we will beg the government for temple funds when our Tamil
Schools are without roof. We will fall on people’s legs for funds when our
children don’t have a proper chair and table to study. The God that did not
punish you for being irresponsible in position will never punish me for
bringing up these issues.
Thirdly,
how many shrines are properly built? We see so many shrines built with used
roof and woods picked up from dumping sites. We want our homes to be beautiful
and nice but God will reside in ran down shelter on the roadside. And the worst
of all is people going house to house asking for donations. Isn’t the temple
was built for the people within its vicinity. You know your way to the liquor
shop to purchase alcohol but you don’t know your way to the temple and your
responsibility? We don’t know to pledge a certain amount of money on a monthly
basis to run a temple that we go weekly? We just don’t care. And the worst out
of all is the ones that come from different state asking for temple donation. We
don’t know if such temples actually exist at times. And whatever donation you
give, it does not fully go to the temple. The travelling cost, food and at
times the accommodation expenditure is included in your donation once its
collectively counted. Why do you need a temple in a particular place if the
community can’t fund. These house to house temple donation drive must be
BANNED. Take the invitation and tell them you will attend whatever function
they have invited to if you are able. It is not necessary to donate. If you
feel bad, take note of how many invitations you have received, make a rough
figure of how much you would have donated and do something for Tamil school
children.
Fourthly, how many priests are trained in
the right manner to do a proper prayers? Whom are training them? What is the
purpose they have come into the spiritual fold? I would not like to comment on
their devotion but being in a temple there should not be theft by the priest, money
swindling by the priest, and immoral acts by the priest which is happening in
our temples. Even if the cases are minimal, there should be no such cases at
any point of time. How many temples are extremely clean? We keep our own houses
super clean but ignore the cleanliness of the temple. Is the rubbish being
disposed in the right manner? Answer yourselves these questions. I too know god
is everywhere, but respect for the institution is vital. Why do we need our
names on the temple walls as donors? The ancient temples never had any names on
it as temple building was regarded as higher then their self. Money was donated
to build temples, not to build to make money. Do you know when did we sell our
integrity for spirituality? When we have to pay for service charges in the name
of rituals and devotion. We did not only dug a grave to it but we killed it and
buried it when it is much needed for the community.
Finally, temples are not yet lost, but if
we don’t change we are not far off being lost.
Comments
Post a Comment